Sitting with my Muslim neighbors

Author: Michael Batinski

The light that illumines our lives sometimes comes upon us by surprise.  I have felt such moments while sitting with my Muslim neighbors in an Islam Study Group.  After discussing the prophets including Mohammed and Jesus, we seemed led to an essential concern.  What, we asked, is prayer?  The question quickly moved us from a description of Muslim practice to a discussion of its significance in the believer’s life.

As I listened and as we shared our thoughts—Muslim and non-Muslim alike–I could not but think of Friends practice that seemed at first so different.  And as I listened I wondered at what seemed to be shared experiential groundings.  I could hear echoes of Thomas Kelly’s Testament of Devotion, especially his discussion of “The Light Within.”  I inquired cautiously by offering these observations in the hope that my thoughts would lead to thoughts on the significance of prescribed times for prayer in one’s daily life.  The answers, in turn, led me to return to Quaker practice, this time with a quickened awareness of the universalist voice among Friends.

Each Wednesday, we have been gathering—Muslim and non-Muslim together.  With each week’s passing I became aware that good work was being done in this circle.  The work hinged in part on raising understanding of the message of Islam.  Certainly, I came to this circle aware of my ignorance.  Christians like myself acquired an education that ignored and still does ignore the Muslim world, its historical experiences and its religious traditions.  Perhaps most of us knew in one way or another that Muslims, Christians, and Jews share a common tradition under the tent of Abraham that Karen Armstrong explores so well.  The study group provides opportunity to stand on that common ground.  With each week that understanding has been growing in different ways among us.  I sensed that deeper understanding grows for Christians like myself not simply from acquiring more information.  Understanding becomes deeper sometimes with a smile of recognition, sometimes with a humorous comment.

As  I reflect on the past year, I am encouraged by the continuous good work undertaken by my neighbors.  This study group emerged out of the twenty-four hour Quran reading held last fall at the Carbondale Interfaith Center.  That experience had led neighbors from both the Abrahamic and non-Abrahamic faith traditions to seek for ways to move from a single event to continuous programs for developing interfaith understandings.  Among the several interfaith activities that have been emerging—communal dinners, for example—were discussion groups such as the one led by teachers from the local mosque.   Christian and Muslim, African, Middle Eastern, and American Muslims, a Christian preparing to convert to Islam, students from the campus Reserve Officer Training program were listening, probing, and pondering.

With each meeting, the group has explored new territory.  One day while we were talking about the Quran as foundation text, I wondered about mysticism in Islam.  The African teacher beamed at once and began to talk about the great Muslim mystics.  While he talked, I felt the circle gather closer.  The closeness emerges from the simple joyful excitement that the Muslim teachers shared with their Christian friends.  At the end of each meeting I walk away confirmed that Quaker traditions of universalism have been revealed in quiet practice.

I am encouraged.

AVP Soars with Youth in Turbo Division – Report from Kenya – August 23, 2011

Author: David Zarembka, Coordinator
African Great Lakes Initiative of the Friends Peace Teams

Dear Friends,

Yesterday Getry Agizah, coordinator for Friends Church Peace Teams (FCPT), Gladys Kamonya, my wife, and I met with thirty-one youth apprentice AVP facilitators who are conducting workshops in Turbo Division. Here in Africa “youth” means anyone under thirty-five years of age.

Hot-spot Turbo Division is where AGLI and FCPT have been putting a lot of effort since the 2008 post election violence. Our goal now is to prevent renewed violence during the August 2012 election campaign. There are seven locations in Turbo Division and we started by doing two basic AVP workshops in each location. This was followed by one advanced workshop in each location. Lastly, there was a three day Training for Facilitators at the newly renovated Lugari Yearly Meeting Peace House for forty-five of the best participants who are now apprentice AVP Facilitators.

Then the apprentice AVP facilitators – with the help of a lead facilitator – conducted four basic apprentice workshops in each location. Altogether over 1400 youth in Turbo Division have now participated in an AVP workshop.

What did we learn about these apprentice workshops with the new youth facilitators during our visit?

In each location the first apprentice workshops were difficult. The apprentice facilitators had to recruit participants to attend the workshops with a goal of 25 participants. Since AVP does not pay the customary sitting allowance for attending a workshop, potential participants were reluctant to come. The first workshop usually then had only sixteen to twenty participants. The inexperienced facilitators were naturally quite nervous.

Over time word got out so that by the third and fourth workshop, the facilitators were having too many participants. Those who were invited would bring along a friend or two and soon there were up to sixty youth wanting to participate. The new facilitators did not want to send people away, but doing an experiential workshop with so many participants destroys some of the essence of the workshop. In Rwanda, AVP facilitators once thought that they could put thirty participants in a workshop, but soon realized that AVP lost some of its effectiveness — they returned to workshops with twenty participants.

So what did they do? In some cases, they were able to send some of the youth home with the understanding that they could come to the next workshop. In the case where there were sixty participants, they divided into two workshops — but there was only the same food for the twenty-five that were planned. The food budget had to be stretched, but as with the loaves and fishes this seemed to work. In another case, when the fourth workshop had too many participants, those who were invited agreed to donate food for an extra workshop for those who were unable to attend. When Getry visited this extra workshop on the last day, she found that at 5:00 PM they were still going strong (and wanting more) even though they had not eaten for the whole day! Getry provided a soda and some bread for the participants.

They have called these additional workshops “voluntary workshops” in that the participants bring the food, obtain the meeting space, and home stays for the facilitators (who meet each night to debrief and plan for the next day’s activities). AGLI/FCPT only provides the lead facilitator and the materials for a cost of about $50 per workshop. Already by the time of our meeting, the apprentice facilitators had conducted two voluntary workshops and had eleven more planned. I expect that they will arrange for even more after this.

I asked them if they were getting only youth who had not participated in the violence. There answer was a resounding “no.” A good number of the participants had confessed that they had participated in the violence and at least one admitted to killing someone. One basic AVP workshop turns these violent youth around and they have committed themselves to being peaceful during the upcoming election cycle.

A number of older people thought that there should be workshops for older people. They felt that they also needed AVP. At least one older person thought that he should be trained as an AVP facilitator.

Roughly half the facilitators and half of the participants were women — a difficult goal to reach in the African context.

September 21 is World Peace Day as proclaimed by the United Nations. In Turbo Division there is going to be a celebration with a walk from each direction. The AVP youth leaders have been asked to participate and organize those youth who have taken AVP. We will see how they respond and what activities they will plan.

In summary, AGLI/FCPT took a most difficult area to work on violence prevention. When we began, many people were negative about the response we would receive in Turbo Division. On the contrary, the response has exceeded even my usually optimistic forecast. My conclusion is: “People are often violent because peacemakers have not made the necessary effort to reach and teach them.”

If you would like to sponsor a voluntary AVP workshop, send $50 to Friends Peace Team/AGLI, 1001 Park Avenue, St Louis, MO 63104 with a notation of “AVP in Turbo, Kenya.”

Thanks,
Dave


David Zarembka, Coordinator
African Great Lakes Initiative of the Friends Peace Teams
P. O. Box 189, Kipkarren River 50241 Kenya
Phone in Kenya: 254 (0)726 590 783 in US: 301/765-4098
Office in US:1001 Park Avenue, St Louis, MO 63104 USA 314/647-1287
Webpage: www.aglifpt.org Email: dave@aglifpt.org

See what you think…. Thomas Merton on protest

“The important thing about protest is not so much the short-range possibility of changing the direction of policies, but the longer range aim of helping everyone gain an entirely new attitude toward war. Far from doing this, much current protest simply reinforces the old positions by driving the adversary back into the familiar and secure mythology of force. Hence the strong ‘patriotic’ reaction against protests in the United States. How can one protest against war without implicitly and indirectly contributing to the war mentality?”

– Thomas Mertonfrom New Seeds of Contemplation

Finding my way: reading historical texts for present day meaning

Author: Breeze Richardson

I have always been drawn to Pendle Hill pamphlets. I still remember the first time I visited Pendle Hill and came upon a long hallway mounted with display racks and pamphlets as far as the eye could see (or so it seemed).  Title after title intrigued me, and many of the selections I picked up that day remain on my bookshelf.

So after years of pondering how to bring Pendle Hill pamphlets more regularly back into my life, I took a moment to visit their website today hoping to discover a few titles I might order as summer reading.  To my delight, I actually found something even better: PDF downloads available for immediate consumption!  How wonderful.

And so I think I will begin a new task as part of my commitment to writing here on this blog, selecting pamphlets of interest and linking to them here, hoping Friends will indulge me in reading along and offering their thoughts.

“The Nature of Quakerism” was written by Howard Brinton in 1949. After clicking the PDF button it took about 15 minutes to read (with interruption – let’s be honest, with two children ages 2 & 4 it’s pretty hard to approach much of anything without interruption).  The reason this title compelled me to log here and share was how eloquently it communicated nearly everything I would include in my summary of the faith tradition I have experienced for nearly my entire life.  With so many interpretations and leadings, seekers and differing spiritual foundations, there are many ways Friends present Quakerism today. And lately, I have found myself in the position to better explain why I define Quakerism in the way I do.

My first smile emerged with Brinton’s explanation Friends’ primary doctrine: “the Presence of God is felt at the apex of the human soul and that man can therefore know and heed God directly, without any intermediary in the form of church, priest, sacrament, or sacred book.”

He then went on to state a flexibility of language that resonated with me: “Many figures of speech are used to designate this Divine Presence which, as immanent in man, is personal and, as transcendent, is super-personal. It is “Light,” “Power,” “Word,” “Seed of the Kingdom,” “Christ Within.” … Man’s endeavor should be to merge his will with the Divine Will, as far as he is able to comprehend it, and by obedience to become an instrument through which God’s power works upon the world.”

As Brinton elaborates on Quakerism’s primary, secondary and tertiary doctrines, I read a text that could have just as easily been written today, and it is the contemporary resonance with a document authored over sixty years ago that really compelled me to share it.

Lastly, I found Brinton’s discourse on meeting for worship and meeting for business quite aspirational (something I really need in my present moment) and his thoughts on harmony (peace making) and simplicity (absence of superfluity) clear and compelling.  Perhaps what most spoke to my current condition was the notion that peace making is in part an effort not “to constrain an individual to express feelings which he does not experience.”  While I fully recognize the Christianity present in both historic and contemporary Quakerism, I appreciate and strongly identity with Brinton’s focus on the commonalities of our primary doctrine in “various forms in all the great religions of the world.” It is this universalism and his notions of “an eternal gospel not exclusively related to particular historical events” that provided me language I did not so clearly have before.

Friends, what is your reaction to Brinton’s historic text? Does it relate to your experience?

What does patriotism mean to you?

ILYM Friend David Finke was profiled last week as part of the Columbia Missourian’s coverage: “Boone County residents describe what patriotism means to them” (July 2, 2011).

David is elequently quoted throughout; here is an excerpt from his profile:

Finke is a member of the Religious Society of Friends, a group otherwise known as the Quakers. He has made a “religious commitment” against war and violence, but he also noted that “to be for peace is more than being against war.”

“To uphold human dignity … is a moral obligation that for me stems both from patriotism and from my religious understanding,” he said.

[sic]

Finke referenced a phrase in the first sentence of the U.S. Constitution: “in order to form a more perfect union.” America, he said, is “not yet perfected.”

I am pleased with much of, but not all, that America stands for. And I will continue to work to make it better: to live up to the dream and the promise.

Finke said he will display his American flag on the Fourth of July because “this should be a symbol that drives the U.S. to be our very best.”

It is always a special moment when the philosophy of Friends is shared with a wider audience, through a contribution such as this.  Check out the rest of David’s profile here.

What does July 4th mean for you, dear Friend? What reflection have you taken on today? What does patriotism mean to you?  Please share your thoughts here.

An Ecumenical Call to Just Peace

Last month the Friends of Illinois Yearly Meeting gathered at our historic meeting house outside of McNabb, IL to hold the Annual Session.  During this time together, business was conducted and resources shared, including a document from the World Council of Churches called, “An Ecumenical Call to Just Peace.”

ILYM Peace Resources Committee has been asked to further distribute this document widely for consideration. Authored in February 2011, the Preamble includes the decree:

Aware that the promise of peace is a core value of all religions, [this Call] reaches out to all who seek peace according to their own religious traditions and commitments. [sic] The call is … commended for study, reflection, collaboration and common action.

We share it with you here, recommending it for study by individual Friends and monthly Meetings. If led, also share your reflections here by Leaving a Reply.  Specifically, the Yearly Meeting has asked PRC to present a workshop on this subject at Annual Session next summer leading us to ask: what discussions would you like to see us facilitate as part of that experience?

DOWNLOAD HERE: An Ecumenical Call to Just Peace

Does standing on the corner holding a sign matter?

Author: Michael Batinski

For some months I have been thinking about the mundane yet shining examples of the way faith and practice join on the path to peace.

This inquiry began a couple days after last Christmas, when I encountered a friend at the coop grocery who regularly joins Carbondale’s Saturday morning peace vigil. I had not attended the last vigil, simply because Christmas fell on Saturday. That morning, while with my family, my thoughts turned to that street corner where the vigil meets. As the customary time approached, I wondered whether others were gathering with their signs calling for peace on earth. I continued to wonder. Spontaneously my friend and I asked each other who had appeared. She too had not attended and also wondered. She had heard that three regulars were there. We were not sure who they were.

I have been reflecting on this moment with the two of us recognizing a shared concern. Sometimes I ask why I still come to that street corner vigil. Does standing on the corner holding a sign calling for the end of war make a difference? The weight of evidence is not encouraging. Public demonstrations for peace seem to have negligible affect on this republic’s deeply engrained war making impulses. Indeed, with the wars’ continuation regardless of the 2008 election’s outcome, I have wondered with others whether the continuing vigil serves to remind passersby that nothing changes and that protest is futile. Is war like the weather? We might complain, but can we do anything about it?

Such questions likely occur to others who congregate on this corner in the cold as well as the blistering heat and who keep this appointment despite the taunts and jeers. Yet such questions may distract us from meanings that lie on the edges of this event, meanings that emerge on another plane than that of practical politics or straightforward cause-effect relationships.

I have been wondering about the feelings that lead me to the Saturday vigil and then to Friends Meeting the following morning. For some time I have been aware of a necessity that moves me to both places. Exploring the similarities returns me to distinctions conventionally made between the religious and the secular. The differences are manifest. In contrast to the quiet of the Quaker Meeting, the street corner is a noisy place with traffic streaming past and the freight train thundering by predictably. Instead of a voice speaking out of the silence, passers-by honk in support or screech obscenities. Such differences notwithstanding, I return to those who remind us and teach us to open ourselves to the religious in everyday life.

I write with care at this point lest I misrepresent these vigil keepers. They come from diverse traditions, some religious and some emphatically secular. Their talk is often not focused on the vigil’s purpose. Nor does the talk turn to religious topics. Some reflect on their personal lives. They joke. They exchange thoughts on other community activities. The wars do not come up, at least not directly. Yet wars are there, always. These people have been gathering despite the lessons that might teach them the futility of their actions. They have been standing on that corner for nearly a decade. Many are veteran advocates of peace. For decades they have protested the growth of the military state and have watched it grow steadily in size. And they keep true to their convictions. Perhaps they do not talk about the pragmatics of their vigil. What impresses me is that they persist and that they persist in good humor.

I recall one rainy day. Drivers were swerving deliberately away from a puddle lest they splatter the protestors. Then with the same deliberation a police car veered in the opposite direction to splash a couple women. All, even the splattered ones, laughed. At times, some one will keep a tally of passersby who honk in support and those who jeer in anger. Some will talk about the agenda of the Southern Illinois Peace Coalition. Tickets will be sold for a folk singer coming to town. I have listened to one steadfast soul ruminate: how can we reach across to those who express such white-hot anger? There seems to be no answer. Yet she is the most faithful attender.

The people who gather—most are women—have been teaching me. Their example returns me to the ageless question regarding the secular and the religious, the sacred and the profane: how can we discern a difference? A light illuminates that street corner. Perhaps that is what draws me. These veteran witnesses for peace continue despite the enervating question: does keeping this appointment stop the shooting? They persist even while attending to weighty personal matters. They tend to partners who are ill. They talk about children, some with their own problems. Some are battling their own illnesses. The distractions are numerous, and yet they gather at noon. Somehow one veteran captures the moment with her sign “I am against the next war.” Another sign reads “Been here since 2001.”

The record of persistence is impressive and teaches me something. Perhaps counting their rates of attendance does not reveal clear meaning. Between fifteen and twenty regulars gather each week, good or bad weather. Is the number small? Perhaps. I do not know. What is their affect on passers-by? On each other? Somehow their smiles and their good faith carry meaning enough in this time of endless war.

I will not be in town for the next eight weeks. Yet I will think of them each Saturday and feel my faith renewed by their shining example.

Quaker Havana Work Camp 2011

Author: Hope Bastian Martinez (reprinted by Dawn Rubbert with permission)

Curious about Cuba? Want to meet a group of progressive semi-programmed friends in Havana? Interested in learning about Quakerism in Cuba and sharing wider Quaker perspectives in Havana Monthly Meeting’s first ever Work Camp?!

Potential hosts: Martin Luther King Center and Havana Monthly Meeting (Quakers)

There’s lots of interest in Cuba in the US, especially among progressive young people and I would like to create an experience for US Quakers to learn about Cuba and participate in meaningful exchange and service with members of the Quaker community in Havana. At this point this project is a “wouldn’t it be cool if…” dream being worked out between myself and the young pastor of Havana Monthly Meeting. We are starting from the idea that Quakers in the US have a lot to learn and a lot to share with folks in Cuba, and the Meeting there is excited about the possibility of receiving a group.

Luckily, due to very recent changes, US religious groups may now freely visit religious communities in Cuba without going through onerous licensing procedures. As a group of Friends we would spend 1-2 weeks getting to know Cuba and Quakers in Havana through shared worship, workshops, and service. This work camp is being planned collaboratively with members of Havana Monthly Meeting and will be designed around the skills and interests of US and Cuban participants.

We will try to keep the cost of the trip as low as possible to cover airfare, lodging and meals in a simple and inexpensive dorm/church housing, local travel, interpreters (if participants don’t speak Spanish), etc. We would also each do fund-raising through our Monthly and Yearly Meetings to cover the cost of whatever service projects we would do with Havana Monthly Meeting friends.

If this sounds like something you might be interested in please get in touch with me! (Editor’s Note: or leave a comment here on “How Do You See Peace?” and we’ll be sure to pass it on!) In your e-mail please let me know little bit about yourself, your interests in visiting Cuba, etc.

Name:
E-Mail:
Phone:

1. Please tell us about your Quaker connections: Are you a member/attender of a Quaker meeting or church? Where?

2. What makes you interested in visiting Cuba?
 
3. Have you traveled internationally before? Where to? Tell us more about the purpose of the trip(s).
 
4. What experiences, knowledge, skills, etc. do you have that you would be willing to share with Friends in Havana? Could you lead workshops on Quaker topics, or topics of interest to Friends?
 
5. On the other hand, what would you like to learn about from Havana Friends?
 
6. Complete the sentence: My trip to Cuba would not be complete without…
 
7. Do you speak Spanish? Would you need an interpreter to participate fully in the exchange?
 
8. When would you be available/interested in traveling? Please list several times when you might be available for example: “any time in the summer” or “during my winter break December 21-January 6” Preference for one or two week trip?
 
For more info or to send in an application: havanaquake2011@gmail.com.

More about us: My name is Hope Bastian Martinez. I’m a graduate student in cultural anthropology at American University and a member of Tallahassee Monthly Meeting (Southeastern YM). I visited Cuba for the first time in 2000 with a group of young people from SEYM. In 2004-2005, I lived in Havana where I collaborated with the Martin Luther King Center and a US NGO hosting study delegations to show US citizens first-hand the effects of US foreign policy in Cuba. From 2008-2009, I worked in Cuba as an editor for a public-health journal and next fall I will be in Havana again as the resident director of American University’s undergraduate study abroad program. Since 2004 I have worshiped with members of a small but vibrant Monthly Meeting in Havana and want to help create connections between Quakers in the US and Havana.

Kirenia Criado Pérez, is the Pastor of Havana Monthly Meeting, a theologian and coordinator of the Theological and Pastoral Reflection and Training Program of the Martin Luther King Center in Havana. Originally from Puerto Padre, Las Tunas she studied at the Evangelical Seminary of Theology in Matanzas, Cuba before settling in Havana. Kirenia is a trained AVP facilitator and has led workshops for young people in Brazil.

Happiness, Peace

Customers are always happy to hear their pianos after I tune them. Is that the only happiness they share with me? No, my other obligation is to be so kind that the customers say to themselves “I’m so glad I could talk to Kent today.”

Peace activism is not only fine-tuning an institution like taxation or social welfare. It is also a commitment to delivering the message so that the audience will say “I’m so glad I interacted with Kent today.” Ineed, if I do not inspire that happiness in my listener, there is little chance that my message will have a positive effect.

Undertaking to be against something constitutes being in opposition. Progress, on the other hand, is a matter of being in support of something. Peace building lifts the self-esteem and happiness of the parties to the peace.

When I try to tune two people who think they hate each other, it is crucial for both of them to conclude “I’m so glad I could talk to Kent today.”

copyright © 2011 Kent Busse
please quote freely